Closed alexgraul closed 12 years ago
If you pass a filter as the first function it should then update all the records that match with the new properties. Is this a different behavior you're proposing?
Yes. Needed for the uniqueAgainst stuff where you want to update a bunch of rows with arbitary changes unique to each row at once without separate events for every row
On 26 Aug 2012, at 17:07, Irene Ros notifications@github.com wrote:
If you pass a filter as the first function it should then update all the records that match with the new properties. Is this a different behavior you're proposing?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
We are grouping this issue into a larger api change upcoming in 0.4. Check out issue #168 for more details.
Modify the .update API to accept a bulk update of records.