Closed Varunram closed 6 years ago
Is that a bad thing? What is there's a failure lower down and the transaction isn't published and we have to resend?
Its a manual command.. If there's a failure, I shouldn't need to press break 9
multiple times. This is similar to the RPC discussion that we had in the other issue.
If we break a channel and no new block has been found in that interval, we can break the channel (ie execute
break
inlit-af
)multiple times and it would still publish the same revPub and related scripts. We need to keep track of channel state breaking even before a block is mined for better UX I guess (or else, the guy may just end up breaking indefinitely till the block is mined - unnecessary panic?)