Closed Cardosaum closed 4 years ago
Count is a reserved word, so maybe try count
?
el
— Sent from Dr Lisse’s iPad Mini 5 On 16 Aug 2020, 18:39 +0200, Matheus Cardoso notifications@github.com, wrote:
Hello all! I just discovered this tool and was poking around with it. Seams like some queries were not yet implemented? Say I have this input file: $ cat input.txt count,string 77766,in the 73529,for the 56800,of the 48059,on the 46528,to be 43250,to the 41130,thanks for 36993,at the 34185,i love 34015,going to If I try to select only those rows with count greater or equal to 56800, I get this error: $ cat input.txt | csvq -f csv "SELECT FROM stdin WHERE count >= 56800" [L:1 C:33] syntax error: unexpected token ">=" However, if I just grab everything, I do get the rows: $ cat input.txt | csvq -f csv "SELECT FROM stdin" count,string 77766,in the 73529,for the 56800,of the 48059,on the 46528,to be 43250,to the 41130,thanks for 36993,at the 34185,i love 34015,going to am I doing something wrong or it's just the case that this sort of queries were not yet implemented? — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
As @ondohotola said, you can execute the following commands.
$ cat input.txt | csvq -f csv 'SELECT * FROM stdin WHERE `count` >= 56800'
$ cat input.txt | csvq -f csv –ansi-quotes 'SELECT * FROM stdin WHERE "count" >= 56800'
Reserved Words https://mithrandie.github.io/csvq/reference/statement.html#reserved_words Grammar of identifier https://mithrandie.github.io/csvq/reference/statement.html#parsing
Oh, I should had read the documentation more carefully.
Thanks for the quick response, and great project!
Hello all!
I just discovered this tool and was poking around with it. Seams like some queries were not yet implemented?
Say I have this input file:
If I try to select only those rows with
count
greater or equal to56800
, I get this error:However, if I just grab everything, I do get the rows:
am I doing something wrong or it's just the case that this sort of queries were not yet implemented?