Open peanutfun opened 3 years ago
@peanutfun Thanks a lot for your valuable proposal. I also think GiNaCDE would attract a larger audience by supporting an additional output format that does not require a software subscription. Recently, we have added the output format ginac
in this PR. As a result, now one can check the solutions in GiNaCDE also. We will soon add some non-proprietary output formats to GiNaCDE, such as Python, LaTex.
Thank you for implementing the ginac
format, I think this was a very important step. If you plan on adding more output formats soon, I propose to leave this issue open such that other users see that this is still under consideration.
Description
GiNaCDE writes output in the Maple and Mathematica language syntax. Both are proprietary. Although https://www.wolframalpha.com technically understands Mathematica, its use in this case is limited, as the expressions found by GiNaCDE are usually to complicated to be tackled by the online tool. I think GiNaCDE would attract a larger audience by supporting an additional output format that does not require a software subscription.
Proposal
Add a non-proprietary output format to GiNaCDE. This can serve two purposes: Better human readability and more use cases in follow-up computations. Two things come to my mind based on the print contexts implemented in GiNaC:
Related issues
openjournals/joss-reviews#3885