The flagging functionality works well, yet feedback from users indicates they are not seeing the flag or are unsure if to click it or not.
USER FEEDBACK
It took me a while to see this and then was hesitant to click, thinking it would flag for inappropriate content. I would make more prominent and clarify.
"Flag" is a little confusing, even though it is explained in the intro FAQ - maybe use "no face" or something more obvious? Also it took me a while to see it
USER FRIENDLY COPY
The tone of text is rather sterile
USER FEEDBACK
I was surprised the prompts weren't introduced as questions - ie. "Perceived Age" vs. "How old is this person?". Is that intentional? If not I think question format would be a lot more human.
Submit Annotations" should be something friendlier, like "Next Face!" Unless you are trying to build participants' understanding of the domain lingo involved.
PROPOSED CHANGES
[x] Make First Tag About Image Quality - If image deemed good proceed to demographics tags, otherwise record flag and proceed to next image
[x] Update Image Quality Text Button items to [Good] [No Subject In Image] [Unclear Subject] [Inappropriate Content]
[x] Remove (age,gender, ethnicity progress bar) to make more space in UI
[x] Reset age slide to 10 (min value) for every new face. Keep on selected age for annotation review
[x] Update "Submit Annotations" Button text to "Next Face"
[x] Update "Perceived Age" text to "Guess Age"
[x] Update "Perceived Gender" text to "Guess Gender"
[x] Update "Perceived Ethnicity" text to "Guess Ethnicity"
[x] Update "Review Your Annotations" text to "Review Your Tags"
[x] On tag review page, add progress text: X/Y Faces Labeled | X Batches Complete
FLAGGING
The flagging functionality works well, yet feedback from users indicates they are not seeing the flag or are unsure if to click it or not.
USER FEEDBACK
It took me a while to see this and then was hesitant to click, thinking it would flag for inappropriate content. I would make more prominent and clarify.
"Flag" is a little confusing, even though it is explained in the intro FAQ - maybe use "no face" or something more obvious? Also it took me a while to see it
USER FRIENDLY COPY
The tone of text is rather sterile
USER FEEDBACK
I was surprised the prompts weren't introduced as questions - ie. "Perceived Age" vs. "How old is this person?". Is that intentional? If not I think question format would be a lot more human.
Submit Annotations" should be something friendlier, like "Next Face!" Unless you are trying to build participants' understanding of the domain lingo involved.
PROPOSED CHANGES