Open jeremander opened 3 weeks ago
I'd be open to a well-written PR if the PEP gets accepted, but to be frank I'm not a fan of the syntax at all. So unless this becomes widely used, I don't want to maintain any of it. 🙊
Understandable. I don't love the syntax either, but I do like the idea of docs-in-annotations generally. I guess we wait and see what happens in terms of adoption.
Problem Description
PEP 727 proposes a standard syntax for applying documentation strings to function parameters, return values, class variables, etc. using
Annotated
/Doc
. While the PEP has not yet been accepted (and may or may not be), some Python libraries like pydantic and FastAPI are already using it regardless.Proposal
It would be nice if
pdoc
could support this, extractingDoc
elements fromAnnotated
type annotations and inserting the text into the appropriate section of the rendered documentation. This could be used in lieu of or in conjunction with existing docstring styles like Google or numpy.Alternatives
I don't think any mainstream doc generators are supporting this syntax yet, but there is an extension for mkdocstrings that does seem to support it.
Additional context
If PEP 727 is accepted, then the
typing
module will introduceDoc
. But otherwise,Doc
is expected to remain in the 3rd partytyping_extensions
library indefinitely.