It seems to me that any errors in the inspec run should be just as impactful. Currently, if I want to fail my compliance based on errors I have to set my max errors to '0' for each criticality. I think it makes more sense to lump all errors together so that instead of:
This last one probably makes the most sense because I don't think I would ever want to make sure that I have at LEAST n number of errors to pass. If the profile is written correctly there should probably never be errors.
It seems to me that any errors in the inspec run should be just as impactful. Currently, if I want to fail my compliance based on errors I have to set my max errors to '0' for each criticality. I think it makes more sense to lump all errors together so that instead of:
I can just say:
or even:
This last one probably makes the most sense because I don't think I would ever want to make sure that I have at LEAST n number of errors to pass. If the profile is written correctly there should probably never be errors.