Closed kevin-j-smith closed 5 years ago
CodeFactor is complaining that something that has already been fixed. I am not sure how to over-correct the non-issue.
Hi, I updated CodeClimate to ignore that file for now, but I do want @samcornwell and @rx294 to review the PR.
You should be able to do a force push of your PR and with the updates to the .gemspec file and CodeClimate your PR should come back clean.
Also, if we are adding new data into the processes - aka your metadata JSON file - we need to update the Docs and examples as well so we communicate it to the end users.
@kevin-j-smith did you force push your branch and you will need to sign your commit as will via git commit ... -s
Did you commit an example of the metadata.json file?
@aaronlippold @kevin-j-smith checking out why this fails some tests
@aaronlippold @kevin-j-smith Committed to non-master branch mitre/fix-pr51
. Fixed bugs in that branch and then pulled into master (see #52)
50
https://github.com/inspec/inspec/pull/3885 https://github.com/inspec/train/pull/418
These changes yield enhancements around additional/missing information for what STIGViewer says is a valid checklist as well as add skip_message to the checklist's justification.