Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago
Hi,
I have made changes on a hg cloned repo that allow the gdata gem to run on Ruby
1.9.1 with passing tests. You can examine the diff here. Would it be possible
to get
these brought back into mainstream?
https://code.google.com/r/hoanga-gdata-ruby-util-ruby19/source/detail?
r=18746fed3ea84601ee9b8ff322e87398d33ecf37
Original comment by hoa...@gmail.com
on 27 Jan 2010 at 4:12
hoanga fixes look good!
Original comment by martin.s...@gmail.com
on 12 Aug 2010 at 7:52
Please can we get this committed and a new version of the gem released. No
1.9.x compat now that Ruby 1.9.2 is released is basically asking for the Gem to
be forked and/or fragmented...
Original comment by si%tinyp...@gtempaccount.com
on 1 Sep 2010 at 12:12
For information purposes, I've cloned hoanga's fork and 1.9 patch onto github
and have packaged up a 1.9 compatible gem "gdata_19" on rubygems. The Github
repo is here: http://github.com/tokumine/GData. Thanks for a great gem!
Original comment by si.tokum...@gmail.com
on 2 Sep 2010 at 7:06
PLEASE release a new version of this gem
You fixed the problem in January 2010 - it's now the end of 2011 - TWO years
later
Anyone using it, or any of the other Google gems that rely on it, in 1.9 (the
current version of Ruby) will get an error
Original comment by jo...@craic.com
on 31 Dec 2011 at 12:09
Just wanted to second this, for now I'm using "gdata_19".
Original comment by vivekg...@gmail.com
on 26 Jun 2012 at 6:57
I've contacted the authors of gdata with the following message.
Hello Trevor and Jeff,
I've begun a project in Rails 3.2 and Ruby 1.9 that uses the Gdata API. The
gdata gem released on rubygems.org is not compatible with Ruby 1.9 and there is
a discussion thread on Google Code at
http://code.google.com/p/gdata-ruby-util/issues/detail?id=9
A user has fixed the compatibility problem and published a new gem with the
name gdata_19 in a forked codebase. Would it be possible to update gdata 1.1.2
to include the compatibility fixes in an official release?
Thanks,
Lee Azzarello
Original comment by l...@rockingtiger.com
on 20 Jul 2012 at 4:41
Original comment by trevorjohns@google.com
on 20 Jul 2012 at 8:08
Lee: Thanks for bringing this to my attention.
kasula: Thanks for the patch. Since this is an official Google project, I'll
need you to sign a contributor license agreement (CLA) before I can merge your
change in. This makes the lawyercats happy.
This can be found here...
Individual: http://code.google.com/legal/individual-cla-v1.0.html
Corporate: http://code.google.com/legal/corporate-cla-v1.0.html
(You can sign the individual version if you own the copyright on your patch.
Sign the corporate version if your patch is submitted on behalf of your
company.)
Once that's done, let me know and I'll pull your changes in.
Original comment by trevorjohns@google.com
on 20 Jul 2012 at 8:45
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
kas...@gmail.com
on 6 Dec 2009 at 7:27