Closed Max-Bladen closed 1 year ago
Ready for review @aljabadi.
I've gone through and seriously cleaned up each of the commits and the accompanying commit messages from the original PRs used to address this issue (#204, #223). I think this one should be fairly self-explanatory
Second set of commits on 13/12/2022 reflect initial set of commits, but replicated after the branch was rebased to master following PR #281.
As per #109, the user should be notified that the Y dataframe (in a DA context) contains
NA
s rather than just displaying an arbitrary error message