The ontology is not clear on what to do with vc:worktype values. The transform outputs those as values of rdf:type. The range of rdf:type is rdfs:Class. I would expect most of the values for vc:worktype will not be instances of rdfs:Class. Is there any concern about that?
The ontology is not clear on what to do with vc:worktype values. The transform outputs those as values of rdf:type. The range of rdf:type is rdfs:Class. I would expect most of the values for vc:worktype will not be instances of rdfs:Class. Is there any concern about that?