Open ronso0 opened 6 months ago
I am a bit afraid of regressions. At least we should not do it during a beta. We need to make our mind clear what is the minimum requirement. Is it OK to at least move this to 2.6-beata?
Not sure which regressions you expect? Whatever minimum size we declare, the skin size warning in the preferecens is just a warning and each skin can still be squeezed into even the smallest screen.
My point is just that increasing the min. width would give us a relaxed default look. And the screen sizes I proposed (1280 / 1366) are reasonable nowadays. For users with RPi or other embedded solutions there won't be a difference since they probably use a custom skin or built-in skin with custom config anyway.
These are the regions that currently don't fit if all skin options are enabled Tango (which already contains some magic to hide the decks's star rating)
Deere
LateNight
Sure we could tweak each skin, e.g. Deere:
Tango:
LateNight:
Both skins would be mor relaxed if we increase the size a bit.
Tango / Deere
1024 -> 1280
LateNight
1280 -> 1366 / 1440 (Looks best on 1920 IMHO)