Open Swiftb0y opened 1 month ago
Is the mapping unusable without this setting? I am asking, because after merging this it is artificialy unusable.
Well, it depends. Its not unusable because it'll only throw when receiving input from those specific controls (so in an input handler; which doesn't break the mapping). If you look at https://github.com/mixxxdj/mixxx/issues/13252, the user is very annoyed with the fact that the mapping tries to enable passthrough (because of them not RTFM). This PR provides the user with explicit feedback what they need to do to fix it, alternatively they can also use the "ignore this error" in the resulting script error popup. Either way, without them setting up the inputs, these buttons are broken anyways. So I wouldn't say this causes further breakage, but it would be nice if someone with access to the controller could confirm.
I can test the change if you give me a hint how to do it. However, I still would have struggled to fix the problem - even with the new message. I would change the text to something like Configuration Error: Mapping expects audio inputs to be configured! Did you change one or both of the channel inputs to either Line or Phono input unintentionally using the switches on the front panel of the controller? Please refer to https://manual.mixxx.org/latest/hardware/controllers/roland_dj_505#audio-setup
I can test the change if you give me a hint how to do it.
You can either check out the modified mapping via git/Github, or you download the two files manually and put them into your user mapping directory. (../controllers
, need to create it if it doesn't exist)
You'll find the files by scrolling to the top of this page, find the Files changed tab, and get the RAW files.
OK - so what are your opinions about the message I suggested? If you agree with it I would love to test it with that message once the PR is updated so we don't have to test it one more time
Changing the text is no big deal, I just want to know whether the rest of the mapping works regardless of the text. The text you suggested is also misleading IMO, the problem is not that you set the switches incorrectly, its that you didn't configure mixxx properly to use the controllers audio inputs IMO.
I would say whether the text is misleading or not is dependent on what you want to achieve. I only started using an external vinyl player this week as an experiment and forgot to change it back. This was causing me not being able to using mixxx as I was used to
Well, thats completely fine, the mapping still expects you to properly configure the inputs, even if you're not sending anything through them (as I assume you're doing with the external vinyl player). In the case where you are using an external player, mixxx will set the corresponding deck to passthrough (to make it apparent that interacting with that deck on the controller will not control mixxx). But passthrough still only works when the input for that deck is actually configured. So no matter whether you use an external player and send the signal to mixxx (for example for vinyl control) or you're bypassing mixxx entirely for improved latency, the audio setup for the controller should still be the exact same (with inputs configured).
friendly ping ;)
Done ;)
I tested it but now the message is gone completely. Also, when I switch to phone, the UI does not display "Passthrough" on the deck
I tested it but now the message is gone completely. Also, when I switch to phone, the UI does not display "Passthrough" on the deck
The switches are only for the routing on the conteoller. There is no auto-switch to Passthrough, why should it? Phono maybe be used for VC or passthrough.
LGTM thanks. @holzhaus wdyt?
I tested it but now the message is gone completely. Also, when I switch to phone, the UI does not display "Passthrough" on the deck
The switches are only for the routing on the conteoller. There is no auto-switch to Passthrough, why should it? Phono maybe be used for VC or passthrough.
I tested it but now the message is gone completely. Also, when I switch to phone, the UI does not display "Passthrough" on the deck
The switches are only for the routing on the conteoller. There is no auto-switch to Passthrough, why should it? Phono maybe be used for VC or passthrough.
Hmmm. Seems like I still don't fully understand how all these things are meant to be used
Actually the DJ-505 seems to do something weird (compared to controllers by Numark or Native Instruments). The tri-state switch on the back only really controls where the audio input is coming from (eg PC or directly (optionally with a phono-preamp)). Then when its set to the PC setting, you would manually need to specify phono/line signal from within serato (see screenshots). Other controllers usually just have line/phono switches and separate "direct-out"/PC switches. So the most recent change (moving the check to the Line/phono case is actually incorrect). Does that make sense @ronso0? Also further reverse-engineering would need to be done on how specifying controlling the input pre-amp from the host sofware works.
the tri-state switch on the back
... front ; )
Does that make sense @ronso0?
Nope :laughing: To me it looks like the block diagram is missing the PC input, so I wouldn't rely on that. Actually @Holzhaus and/or @spotlesscoder have to verify what is strictly required to play sounds from a Mixxx deck.
Re: Searato DVS
If you use DVS, it is not possible to combine a turntable with a DJ player. In this case, you must use either use two turntables or two DJ players.
Also further reverse-engineering would need to be done on how specifying controlling the input pre-amp from the host sofware works.
:+1: So the switches can be set internally, but not independently :grimacing:
So what exactly can I do to help here?
IIUC this is the situation (please edit this post if I'm wrong): For vinyl control you need to set the PC/Line/Phono switches to PC and to configure the VC inputs in Mixxx. Use Phono or Line if you want to use that channel in standalone mode, i.e. use the input without Mixxx. As the official DJ-505 manual states, for VC in Serato, you need to select the input sources (phono or line level) there (Serato can only set it for both inputs).
Now, the easy part is to find out which input level the Phono/Line inputs are set to by default:
The reverse-engineering part is figuring out how the level (phono pre-amp On/Off) is set via software. For that we need someone with the DJ-505, Serato installed and a USB sniffer (wireshark?) in order to check the message sent to the DJ-505 when Serato is setting it up for either turntable or CDJ.
To me it looks like the block diagram is missing the PC input, so I wouldn't rely on that.
If that switch is in PC, it'll likely just disable the internal analog mixing and just rely on the fact that the deck sound is coming through the "Master Input" (thats also how it works on virtually any other controller I own).
As the official DJ-505 manual states, for VC in Serato, you need to select the input sources (phono or line level) there (Serato can only set it for both inputs).
The screenshot I posted above explicitly state that for VC the input needs to be set to PC IMO. otherwise it would just mix the VC signal internally as if it was some external music input.
If that switch is in PC, it'll likely just disable the internal analog mixing and just rely on the fact that the deck sound is coming through the "Master Input" (thats also how it works on virtually any other controller I own).
:+1:
The screenshot I posted above explicitly state that for VC the input needs to be set to PC IMO. otherwise it would just mix the VC signal internally as if it was some external music input.
Jup, that's what I was trying to say. PC on the controller, Ch1+2 or 3+4 in Mixxx.
If you need me to test something with the device, I need a bit of assistance - you can contact me and we can make a screen share call
Fixes #13252 Untested as I don't have the controller. CC @Holzhaus @spotlesscoder