Open mixxxbot opened 2 years ago
Commented by: kousu Date: 2009-01-21T21:40:52Z
Seconded. This has been in the back of my mind for a while. I don't think it's mentioned on the wiki anywhere, but maybe I missed it. If it's not we should spec it out (but before we can do this the controller code needs overhauling).
Commented by: rryan Date: 2009-04-05T18:12:23Z
Marking wishlist -- OSC has been proposed before but we have way too little manpower to even approach this in the near term.
Commented by: Pegasus-RPG Date: 2010-02-19T08:19:07Z
We looked into this a bit and OSC doesn't have any standard messaging format. We'd need to create a class structure similar to the MIDI one that includes an OSCDevice class (that really doesn't do much except passing OSC data to/from the OS) that each supported device would sub-class inside a script (using QtScript's C++ interactions) to implement all functionality. (I.e. scripting for OSC devices would be a requirement due to the lack of standard messaging.)
This sounds like it would be pretty self-contained so is a good candidate for a newer contributor.
Commented by: Pegasus-RPG Date: 2010-03-08T21:06:45Z
I just came across some information that explains a standard for MIDI-over-OSC: http://www.symbolicsound.com/cgi-bin/bin/view/Learn/BidirectionalMIDIStreamsOverOSC http://opensoundcontrol.org/spec-1_0
An interested party could pretty easily write a MIDIDeviceOSC class so we could at least support those without too much effort. Again, self-contained and there's plenty to work from with the existing MIDIDevice and MIDIDeviceHSS1394 classes.
Commented by: brianwredfern Date: 2012-01-26T08:27:11Z
Mixxx and Control would be a great match with OSC support, if this hasn't been tackled yet I would like to take a whack at it.
Commented by: Pegasus-RPG Date: 2012-01-26T09:50:34Z
I'm working on the controllerAbstraction branch that wil allow other non-MIDI back-ends to be used, like OSC. If you want to work on it now, check out that branch and basically just copy the HID classes but change them to OSC, then implement the back-end in OSCDevice. Since the branch is still in active development, APIs might change, but probably not too much at this point.
Commented by: Pegasus-RPG Date: 2014-10-31T16:41:24Z
Just an update: Mixxx 1.11.0 released with HID controller support so the API will be stable now. Feel free to copy the HID classes, rename them and replace the implementation details for OSC-specific ones.
Commented by: rryan Date: 2014-10-31T17:02:16Z
The beginnings are already done here: https://github.com/rryan/mixxx/tree/osc
Anyone interested should feel free to take this over.
Commented by: alexandre-quessy Date: 2016-04-23T19:26:34Z
Hi everyone, Ryan: I have been thinking about implementing this feature in Mixxx for a little while. Here are a glimpse of my skills:
So, that means I would probably need some walkthrough with someone who knows Mixxx's source code and its build system better than me. Also, I might need some help to make sure it builds on OS X and Windows. I am aalex on IRC.
As I see in https://github.com/rryan/mixxx/blob/osc/src/controllers/osc/osccontroller.h, that means that the next steps are to include the liblo.h headers and use them. I have some C++ wrapper for liblo's C API here: https://github.com/mapmapteam/mapmap/blob/develop/OscReceiver.h - though there are new liblo_cpp.h headers available nowadays: http://liblo.sourceforge.net/examples/cpp_example.cpp.html - so we should rather use that.
I think the controller approach is good at first, but then we might later add as well the possibility to subscribe to Mixxx's events, so that other application could listen to its events and act accordingly. That's for another feature request, though.
Next step: I should spend an hour or two discussing with Ryan about what work I should do, and how I can test it. Does this make sense?
Thank you!
Commented by: daschuer Date: 2018-09-09T08:18:21Z
Related: https://www.mixxx.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=8003 https://github.com/daschuer/mixxx/tree/osc_support
Commented by: macrophone Date: 2020-01-18T15:50:45Z
Hi everyone, OSC support would be great for me! My use case : In dance workshops, before my DJ set I lead a "warm-up" exercice, it's better for me to be with the people on the floor rather in the DJ booth. I want to start some music during the exercice, then go to my booth after 4 or 5 tracks and continue the DJ set seamlessly. It could be a great feature for a lot of dance teachers.
Reported by: spam-kernelspace-deactivatedaccount Date: 2009-01-20T22:17:53Z Status: Triaged Importance: Wishlist Launchpad Issue: lp319386
Hello!
I think Mixxx is a great app! But I think there is something missing that will make it even better...
It would be great to have access to all controllers via OSC (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenSound_Control). This would allow integration with other software and even remote controlling over networks.
Specifically I am thinking about using pd (PureData) to translate sensor input from any imaginable hardware device to OSC and then feeding the data into Mixxx. Compared to MIDI it would allow for much higher controller resolution.