Open mjethanandani opened 4 years ago
Do you want to assign this feature to me so that I solicit authors for a draft?
I had a discussion with all of you and just putting it up for a record. We should consider this as a AF level feature with default enabled to true. Implementations can deviate and do the needful?
See discussion in Issue #242. Juniper, for example, only does no-client-reflect at the per-group scope, with per-neighbor override. It's not AF-specific.
Do a PR to show what you think the changes should be.
The draft defines a node 'no-client-reflect' which when set to 'true', this disables route redistribution by the Route Reflector. It is set 'true' when the client is fully meshed to prevent sending of redundant route advertisements.