Open marcellovictorino opened 1 year ago
@mjirv as requested, splitting the original into separate PRs I will hold on the second PR, saving the mocked model output as view for improved error visibility, for later 👍 I will even create an issue for it
@mjirv bumping for visibility Thanks!
@marcellovictorino thanks for bumping! I had missed that you updated this. Reviewing now!
@mjirv Thanks for the new review! It has been a busy week. But I am interested in applying the fixes and trying to create the end-to-end test. Might take a bit longer, but would be a learning opportunity for me, and hopefully easier for future contributions 😅 🎉 I will aim to complete this before the end of this week (4th November)
@marcellovictorino awesome, let me know if you need anything!
This is a:
Description & motivation
Addressing this issue, enables to define a test once, to be applied over multiple test cases.
Applicable when there are multiple test case scenarios, where the mocked input and expected output data (seed) represent a single case, having the seed file names identified by
test_case_1
,test_case_2
etc.Checklist
Additional comments
Splitting the original PR into two separate ones: this one focus on enabling multiple test cases within a single test definition