Open Vadim2S opened 2 years ago
Hi, Thanks for your false-positive example report. Future works may focus more on images containing a relatively bright object compared to other regions, as your example suggests. Image manipulation detection is an ongoing research field and it is a very challenging task. I recommend you to compare the outputs with other state-of-the-art forgery detectors, such as ManTra-Net, Noiseprint, EXIF-SC. Public forensic dataset results say CAT-Net overperforms current best approaches. Thank you.
Those project are dead. Python 3.5 and Tensorflow 1.8 required too much work just for launch. Cat-Net do good result, except:
1) "Magic wand" like tool removal. I am attach Spain picture with building crane at end of channel. In air it removed with "magic wand" but you can see it mirroring in water.
2) Shape alternation. I am attach Proportion picture with instagramm body alternation. You can see difference.
Both cases do not detected at all
.
Thanks for your good analysis. However, please keep in mind that CAT-Net targeted splicing and copy-move forgeries. You know, CAT-Net mainly uses compression artifacts to detect splicings or copy-moves since pasted regions will likely be misaligned with the original image. Object removal like 'magic wand' and shape alternation forgeries are indeed very popular manipulation in real-world scenarios, but those types of forgeries were not used to train CAT-Net. This was mainly due to a lack of those types of datasets. Building a network that can detect those manipulations jointly with copy-pasting would be nice work though. ☺️
Those project are dead. Python 3.5 and Tensorflow 1.8 required too much work just for launch. Cat-Net do good result, except:
- "Magic wand" like tool removal. I am attach Spain picture with building crane at end of channel. In air it removed with "magic wand" but you can see it mirroring in water.
- Shape alternation. I am attach Proportion picture with instagramm body alternation. You can see difference. Both cases do not detected at all
![]()
.
Hi, what data set are you using
Sorry, it is my own small dataset with 5-10 typical fake examples for each type alteration (insert, delete, alter) and each type instrument (Paint, Photoshop, Neural-Net). Nothing private but too unorganized for share.
I see. Thank you
------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------ 发件人: "mjkwon2021/CAT-Net" @.>; 发送时间: 2021年11月10日(星期三) 晚上7:47 @.>; @.**@.>; 主题: Re: [mjkwon2021/CAT-Net] Too much false fake face detection (#3)
Sorry, it is my own small dataset with 5-10 typical fake examples for each type alteration (insert, delete, alter) and each type instrument (Paint, Photoshop, Neural-Net). Nothing private but too unorganized for share.
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS or Android.
For example: attached image. My cat with melon. Original photo, slightly unfocused. Please, ignore all text
.