search

mjvakili / ccppabc

Approximate Bayesian Computation
MIT License
1 stars 1 forks source link

Response to the referee #24

Closed mjvakili closed 7 years ago

mjvakili commented 7 years ago

@changhoonhahn : could you read what's added to the response to the referee report and edit it?

changhoonhahn commented 7 years ago

@mjvakili : I've made some major edits to the referee report response. Can you read through them?

For Major Comment #2, I don't think the response you drafted answers the referee's comment appropriately. They are more appropriate for answering comment #1.

For Major Comment #4, did you write something up? If so, it's not there in reflected in the referee_report.md

changhoonhahn commented 7 years ago

@mjvakili : Also, in the abstract, we do not say

that an incorrect form of the likelihood function can lead to biased parameter inference So I have removed that from the response to Ref Report Comment #1.

changhoonhahn commented 7 years ago

@mjvakili : I've added responses to comments 2 and 4. I don't think we've addressed the referee's comments very comprehensively, but perhaps it's sufficient -- especially since it's due tomorrow!

mjvakili commented 7 years ago

@changhoonhahn Ok great. Let me go through them again

mjvakili commented 7 years ago

@changhoonhahn : The response to the referee looks very concise but that should be okay since the changes made in the text are comprehensive. I think this looks good.

davidwhogg commented 7 years ago

My only advice is to be very nice to the referee.