Closed abiduzz420 closed 6 years ago
The check is failing
(node:3921) UnhandledPromiseRejectionWarning: Unhandled promise rejection (rejection id: 1): WebDriverError: Authorization required
(node:3921) [DEP0018] DeprecationWarning: Unhandled promise rejections are deprecated. In the future, promise rejections that are not handled will terminate the Node.js process with a non-zero exit code.
WebDriverError: Authorization required
@mkermani144 Could you help me in figuring out what could be the possible reason this error has occured?
Hi @mkermani144 I would like to know the issues which caused the TravisCI checks to fail. I am still very naive with TravisCI. I shall be happy to fix the errors :)
@abiduzz420 Sorry for late response. I'm busy these days 😉. I think your PR fails because the repo E2E tests can only be run from PRs of my own repo, not any forks. I will check your PR in a few days and if it's OK I will try to fix the failure or merge it anyway.
Thank you @mkermani144 . Please let me know if you need any help.
Merging #252 into master will increase coverage by
0.04%
. The diff coverage is100%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #252 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 82.29% 82.33% +0.04%
==========================================
Files 38 39 +1
Lines 401 402 +1
Branches 32 32
==========================================
+ Hits 330 331 +1
Misses 67 67
Partials 4 4
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
src/Task/Estimation.js | 100% <ø> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
src/FAB/NewIdeaDialog.js | 100% <ø> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
src/Settings/CalendarSystemDialog.js | 100% <ø> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
src/Idea/EditIdeaDialog.js | 100% <ø> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
src/Settings/FirstDayOfWeekDialog.js | 100% <ø> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
src/Task/EditTaskDialog.js | 100% <ø> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
src/Idea/ConvertIdeaDialog.js | 100% <ø> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
src/FAB/NewTaskDialog.js | 100% <ø> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
src/Task/Repeat.js | 100% <ø> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
src/Task/DueDate.js | 100% <ø> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
... and 5 more |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 8d5f880...ccd1b0e. Read the comment docs.
@abiduzz420 I'm so sorry for my very late response. I fixed the problem that caused Travis to fail (see #253) and then merged the new master branch into yours. Now all your PR checks pass and there is no problem anymore. I will review your code asap, as it's not ready to be merged into the master branch and does need some major changes.
Okay sure @mkermani144 Do let me know if you need anything.
@abiduzz420 In addition to my comments, I think using a global CSS style (not a JS one) such as
* {
user-select: none;
}
in App.css
will do the job without any extra effort and multiple file changes, as this is an app and no user ever need to select any text in the app most of the times (except for inputs and text areas). In addition, it adapts better to the current state of the repo, as we use CSS styles wherever possible, and switch to JS ones only when we have to.
I suggest you close this PR and make another one to prevent adding any extra commits to the repo.
@abiduzz420 Please let me know if you are interested in working on #218 anymore, as I'm going to release a new version of the app and #218 needs to be fixed before the release.
Hi @mkermani144 I have a bit busy due to my exams, can I get this fixed by Sunday ?
@abiduzz420 Certainly. I can wait until the end of Sunday. Please don't forget to consider the points I mentioned in my previous comment, so I can merge your next PR fast and without any change requests.
Because of no response, I close this PR. To fix the issue I opened #264.
What does this PR solve ?
Why should this PR be considered?
If there any changes or modifications to be made with regards to code style guide or anything, do let me know. Thanks!