mkevenaar / chocolatey-packages

My chocolatey packages
https://mkevenaar.github.io/chocolatey-packages/
Apache License 2.0
42 stars 66 forks source link

PowerToys not upgrading to 0.69.1 from 0.68.1 #193

Closed jeansagi closed 1 year ago

jeansagi commented 1 year ago

Expected Behavior

After a new release chocolatey should offer an upgrade

Current Behavior

Powertoys stays in release 0.68.1 and for an unknown (to me) reason does not offer an upgrade to 0.69.1

Possible Solution

Review the upgrade process and offer an upgrade to the latest version (in this case: 0.69.1)

Steps to Reproduce (for bugs)

  1. choco outdated (as of 13apr2023, shows the latest version is 0.68.1)
  2. https://github.com/microsoft/PowerToys/releases/ (as of 13apr2023, shows the latest version is 0.69.1)

Context

Powertoys own upgrade feature is notifying an updated version exists but chocolatey do not.

Your Environment

jeansagi commented 1 year ago

Looking into the repository file:

It explicitly mentions:

It should refer to 0.69.1 instead...

Is this file generated manually or automatically?

J.

TheCakeIsNaOH commented 1 year ago

Looks like the PowerToys installer is now too big, over 200mb, so it will have to be converted to a non-embedded package. https://ci.appveyor.com/project/mkevenaar/chocolatey-packages/builds/46781908#L464

I don't know why they need so much space, that is massive for what functionality it provides. Maybe they are shipping a browser in it now or something?

jeansagi commented 1 year ago

Well... It is from Microsoft... you know... ;)

J.

El jue, 13 abr 2023 a las 19:24, TheCakeIsNaOH @.***>) escribió:

Looks like the PowerToys installer is now too big, over 200mb, so it will have to be converted to a non-embedded package. https://ci.appveyor.com/project/mkevenaar/chocolatey-packages/builds/46781908#L464

I don't know why they need so much space, that is massive for what functionality it provides. Maybe they are shipping a browser in it now or something?

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/mkevenaar/chocolatey-packages/issues/193#issuecomment-1507763252, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFY3AEOSOEELNA72U7XXQQTXBCKLHANCNFSM6AAAAAAW5HC7KM . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>

--

J.

jeansagi commented 1 year ago

It looks like this is going to take "some time" to get sorted out...

I think I better will upgrade PowerToys using its own upgrader ;)

In the meantime, I will leave this issue open.

J.

dsan0815 commented 1 year ago

Looks like the PowerToys installer is now too big, over 200mb, so it will have to be converted to a non-embedded package.

0.68.1 is rd. 170mb, 0.69.1 is now rd. 200mb -> 30mb more ... and ... where is the problem.

jeansagi commented 1 year ago

>> 0.68.1 is rd. 170mb, 0.69.1 is now rd. 200mb -> 30mb more ... and ... where is the problem.

Probably is something too hard to overcome...

J.

El lun, 1 may 2023 a las 5:54, dsan0815 @.***>) escribió:

Looks like the PowerToys installer is now too big, over 200mb, so it will have to be converted to a non-embedded package.

0.68.1 is rd. 170mb, 0.69.1 is now rd. 200mb -> 30mb more ... and ... where is the problem.

  • Typical drives in notebook and desktops are >1tb :)
  • install-procedure is same

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/mkevenaar/chocolatey-packages/issues/193#issuecomment-1529570640, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFY3AEI3QW5NRUNXMQUIW5TXD6I5DANCNFSM6AAAAAAW5HC7KM . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>

--

J.

TheNavyBear commented 1 year ago

It doesn't have to do with size of installer. The Powertoys team has switched the installer model to support machine-wide and user-instance installs now (it used to be machine-wide only). The package will have to be rebuilt to recognize the different installers, and handle the appropriate one.

You can find out more information here: https://github.com/mkevenaar/chocolatey-packages/issues/184

jeansagi commented 1 year ago

Umm...

Looks like, and I hope not, Chocolatey Powertoys package is abandonware...

J.

TheNavyBear commented 1 year ago

Umm...

Looks like, and I hope not, Chocolatey Powertoys package is abandonware...

J.

If you truly feel that way you can use the Chocolatey process to request a new maintainer, and you can also request to become the maintainer if you want.

I personally don't believe it is abandonware yet. This developer has been pretty on top of things up till now, maybe they are having a family emergency or some other issue. I hope they are all right and that this package does get updated soon, however, if it doesn't, Chocolatey does have a process in place to deal with that.

jeansagi commented 1 year ago

Looking like (to me) does not imply it is.

I also think it is not the time yet to ask for a new maintainer and for sure I won't be ;). (BTW: Also hoping too that the current maintainer is well without any issue).

But it is worth noting that more than a month ago it was suggested what now it seems to me is happening (as you point out: #184 https://github.com/mkevenaar/chocolatey-packages/issues/184).

J.

El lun, 1 may 2023 a las 19:48, Rob Berg @.***>) escribió:

Umm...

Looks like, and I hope not, Chocolatey Powertoys package is abandonware...

J.

If you truly feel that way you can use the Chocolatey process to request a new maintainer, and you can also request to become the maintainer if you want.

I personally don't believe it is abandonware yet. This developer has been pretty on top of things up till now, maybe they are having a family emergency or some other issue. I hope they are all right and that this package does get updated soon, however, if it doesn't, Chocolatey does have a process in place to deal with that.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/mkevenaar/chocolatey-packages/issues/193#issuecomment-1530709307, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFY3AEMATSMSEBL76DK7SYDXEBKU7ANCNFSM6AAAAAAW5HC7KM . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>

--

J.

jeansagi commented 1 year ago

Simply curious:

Why did the Repository owner deleted a comment from @asheroto?

Its comment seemed relevant.

J.

mkevenaar commented 1 year ago

A new version should be pushed soon

jeansagi commented 1 year ago

Hey!

Why is this case closed?

choco outdated does not detect yet that version 0.69.1 is available?

choco info powertoys still shows 0.68.1 as the current version.

I think It shouldn't be closed until choco info powertoys states the "real" current version.

El mié, 17 may 2023 a las 12:21, Maurice Kevenaar @.***>) escribió:

Closed #193 https://github.com/mkevenaar/chocolatey-packages/issues/193 as completed via #196 https://github.com/mkevenaar/chocolatey-packages/pull/196.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/mkevenaar/chocolatey-packages/issues/193#event-9272030657, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFY3AEPQ4PSSXVMWIC45K5DXGUCJ7ANCNFSM6AAAAAAW5HC7KM . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.*** com>

--

J.

mkevenaar commented 1 year ago

A new version is pushed, should be available in the next couple of hours when automated checks are complete. There is no need to keep the issue open until those checks are complete