Closed vfdev-5 closed 6 years ago
Hi, vfdev-5. The current implementations's dim order is [batch_size, ch, x_dim, y_dim] and your example is [batch_size, ch, y_dim, x_dim], maybe the inverted order of x_dim and y_dim cause the inverted results. Beside, your code works when x_dim and y_dim is the same value. But it doesn't work with different x_dim and y_dim. Maybe you should consider it.
@mjDelta I see what you mean. Thanks for the comment !
Fix typo:
x_dim -> y_dim
and exchangexx_channel
andyy_channel
.Comparing with original TF implementation from the paper:
gives
and
However current implementations give inverted results.