Closed maxaalexeeva closed 2 years ago
Oops, and it looks like one ParameterSetting test (u5a) is failing. The test sentence is this:
For the purposes of model parameterisation the value of shoot_lag has been assumed to be around 40 o Cd.
It's failing because "value of shoot_lag" is captured as a variable instead of "shoot_lag". Do you have any idea why this change occurred?
@alicekwak
It's failing because "value of shoot_lag" is captured as a variable instead of "shoot_lag".
Nooooo! That was one of those accidentally fixed tests and now it broke again because of who knows what! Bummer.
Merging #281 (0233bad) into master (26d129b) will decrease coverage by
0.01%
. The diff coverage isn/a
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #281 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 66.04% 66.02% -0.02%
==========================================
Files 95 95
Lines 17892 17892
==========================================
- Hits 11816 11814 -2
- Misses 6076 6078 +2
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
automates/model_analysis/graph_manipulation.py | 70.19% <0.00%> (-0.56%) |
:arrow_down: |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 26d129b...0233bad. Read the comment docs.
var-word-equals_value-token
and theassembleVarsWithParamsAndUnits
action: