Closed rynoV closed 2 years ago
I assume merging this will mean we'll need to update the ctl ref in the monorepo as well?
It would probably be for the best. Maybe we should merge into some kind of staging branch instead?
Perhaps, but it's a relatively uncommon change, I think it's fine to just pr both of them the subrepo should be commit locked anyway
Closes #37 and #30
Changes:
Contract
'sextraConfig
getWalletBalance
so it doesn't cause a major error, see https://github.com/mlabs-haskell/seabug-contracts/pull/39/commits/e04e2f2d8028bc0dcb11eb3dbd3c3b03527e79da and https://github.com/mlabs-haskell/nft-marketplace/tree/calum/contracts-updatesTODO:
extraConfig
projectId
liftX
functions to make interoperating with all of CTL'sContract
functions easier, but I don't think it's worth it right now