Open VukW opened 2 months ago
The solution makes complete sense to me. We should do this for all the losses, not just ce. And on that note, perhaps ce
is a bit ambiguous, and we should make it explicit: either CEL
(i.e., cross entropy loss), BCEL
(i.e., binary cross entropy loss), or BCEL_logits
(i.e., binary cross entropy with logits).
Thoughts?
Stale issue message
Describe the bug
During loss computations it is assumed that loss function takes three params: prediction, target, params. However, it's not true for CE loss that takes only prediction and target, so using
loss_function: ce
fails.To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior: try to train any model with
loss_function: ce
Expected behavior
A clear and concise description of what you expected to happen.
Media
If applicable, add images, screenshots or other relevant media to help explain your problem.
Environment information
GaNDLF version, OS, and any other relevant information.
Additional context
The straightforward solution is just to add an unused
params
arg to CE function. However, I believe, doing this would cause linter / codacy failures as parameter is defined but not used. In this case the best option IMO is to create a standard class interface for losses:and the same with all other losses. In this case all the losses would have the same signature and can be used interchangeably. If signature of any loss function differs, both Codacy and IDE would warn developer that something goes wrong.