There is a need to build a "shared intuition" (versus a white/black list) among submitters for what optimizations are allowed. We want some way this alignment can be also be used to reduce confusion/disagreement during post submission review. This could take the form of a "conceptual test", statement of "principles", or something else.
Examples; what parts of minigo can be changed? How can step schedules be compressed?
AI(Victor) - Circulate a document where we can enumerate criteria for and discuss a "conceptual test".
There is a need to build a "shared intuition" (versus a white/black list) among submitters for what optimizations are allowed. We want some way this alignment can be also be used to reduce confusion/disagreement during post submission review. This could take the form of a "conceptual test", statement of "principles", or something else.
Examples; what parts of minigo can be changed? How can step schedules be compressed?
AI(Victor) - Circulate a document where we can enumerate criteria for and discuss a "conceptual test".