As a user I am currently assuming that whatever I am drawing will be on top of everything that has been draw so far. This doesn't quite work together with toggling the visibility of classes as it seems the z-order isn't always retained.
For example, if I start by creating a background class, cover the entire image, then hide the background class to be able to see the data, then annotate the slice with the "actual" data classes, then -un-hide the background class, I can only see the background class covering all other annotations, even though I have in principe "drawn on top" of them.
Similarly, when having multiple classes and shapes, toggling visibility of a class can cause changes in the ordering.
Wiebke
commented
3 months ago
As a user I am currently assuming that whatever I am drawing will be on top of everything that has been draw so far. This doesn't quite work together with toggling the visibility of classes as it seems the z-order isn't always retained.
For example, if I start by creating a background class, cover the entire image, then hide the background class to be able to see the data, then annotate the slice with the "actual" data classes, then -un-hide the background class, I can only see the background class covering all other annotations, even though I have in principe "drawn on top" of them.
Similarly, when having multiple classes and shapes, toggling visibility of a class can cause changes in the ordering.