Closed patrickzib closed 1 year ago
Hi Patrick,
Thank you for your interest. In the paper we set nsax = 0 and nsfa = 5 and default values for the remaining parameters. We find this the most balanced configuration in our experiments: not slow and good accuracy. Increasing nsfa (>5) can improve the overall accuracy a little but it is not worth the cost of speed in our opinion.
Hi Thach,
great, thank you :) I was not sure how to translate SFA_k5 into nsax and nsfa. Your answer solved it.
Hi, great work! :)
I am having problems to set the best hyper-parameters for the UCR-datasets.
Currently, the default-parameters seem to be optimized for speed, but the accuracy is rather low (measured on my hardware)
What would be the best set of parameters to obtain get results from the paper? In the paper this is referred to as
MrSQM_SFA_k5
.