Open danielhorn opened 8 years ago
linear radial
9 0
> des
selected.learner classif.randomForest.mtry classif.randomForest.nodesize classif.svm.cost classif.svm.kernel classif.svm.gamma classif.knn.k
1 a 1 1 NA <NA> NA NA
4 c NA NA NA <NA> NA 17
5 b NA NA 4.035 linear NA NA
6 b NA NA -5.020 linear NA NA
7 b NA NA 5.634 linear NA NA
9 c NA NA NA <NA> NA 3
11 c NA NA NA <NA> NA 1
12 b NA NA 7.371 linear NA NA
13 c NA NA NA <NA> NA 21
15 b NA NA -9.070 linear NA NA
16 c NA NA NA <NA> NA 16
17 b NA NA 9.809 linear NA NA
19 c NA NA NA <NA> NA 6
20 c NA NA NA <NA> NA 13
171 c NA NA NA <NA> NA 7
18 b NA NA -7.494 linear NA NA
191 b NA NA -13.941 linear NA NA
181 c NA NA NA <NA> NA 2
201 b NA NA -14.846 linear NA NA
202 c NA NA NA <NA> NA 5
>
Evaluation during hangout call:
1) that we only have 1 row for sel.learner = "a" is OK and good. as the lower/upper limits only allow one value for its param (weirdly), the duplicated "a" rows are removed and then filled up with other design points.
2) that we only have kernel = linear is "bad luck". and happens because the algo to gen the design is suboptimal. we generate the LHS, then set invalid subordinate param values to NAs. apparently that happens for kernel = rbf a lot more oftem here....
This is bad ... the factor level radial is never visited, while factor leven linear is 9 times. Should not happen?