Is RCLL's range correct? From it's formula, I would guess [0, Inf]?
For every measure initialized with ERV = TRUE (they are all currently losses), we should also change its properties minimize (from TRUE to FALSE) and range (to [-Inf, 1] => 0 means same performance as Kaplan-Meier, negative values worse, positive values better than KM and 1 is the absolute possible maximum for ERV measures).
Good catch! Technically the upper limit actually depends on the eps parameter so with the default it's [0, 34.53878] but ignoring that yes it's [0, Inf)
Hi,
[0, Inf]
?ERV = TRUE
(they are all currently losses), we should also change its propertiesminimize
(fromTRUE
toFALSE
) andrange
(to[-Inf, 1]
=> 0 means same performance as Kaplan-Meier, negative values worse, positive values better than KM and 1 is the absolute possible maximum for ERV measures).