Closed sebastian-echeverria closed 3 weeks ago
Have updated the report model to use the new backend.
I don't think that the dev resources or QAS are intended to be added in the report even if the page has the data now, but would have to check with @GALewis to confirm that is the case.
Thanks @sei-aderr. In one of the meetings that we had with Kate regarding the report, the idea is basically to replicate the date from the Negotiation Card in the report so that readers can have context. In that case, I believe the answer is yes.
I am fine to add those fields to the report but, if we continue to add fields from the negotiation card to the report at some point we need to reconsider if they need to be separate entities when the report is all the same fields + 2 or 3 for results.
Similarly, the exported version of the report will need to be revisited if the report form continues to expand
Understood. The thing with the Report is that it also has the test results; the rest is just context. But yes, I get your point.
Going to close this task as complete with the frontend changes for the new unified model in task, adding the fields will be continued in report form evaluation in #463
Fixed by #448
As per #458, the duplicated data in the Report model will be unified with the Negotiation Card to simplify the underlying code. Update the frontend to get the Report data from the new structure locations.
It would also be useful to add the data from the NegotiationCard model not currently in the report: that is, dev resources, and the list of QAS.