Closed sebffischer closed 4 months ago
@dfalbel what is your opinion on this, do you want this in the torch package at all?
Yes, I think that's a useful feature! Do you mind checking why it fails on CI? We could also instead of registering onm package load, only register it when testing. Eg defining it in https://github.com/mlverse/torch/blob/main/tests/testthat/setup.R
It should be fixed now. I would prefer to add it during package so other people (including myself) can use it in their tests as well.
I am a bit confused by the failing windows test and the centos failure does not seem to be caused by this PR.
Yes, it's failing on older R versions I think:
Error: Error: argument "path" is missing, with no default
Backtrace:
x
1. +-testthat::expect_failure(expect_equal(x, x$clone())) at test-compare.R:37:3
2. | \-testthat::capture_expectation(expr)
3. | \-base::tryCatch(...)
4. | \-base (local) tryCatchList(expr, classes, parentenv, handlers)
5. | \-base (local) tryCatchOne(expr, names, parentenv, handlers[[1L]])
6. | \-base (local) doTryCatch(return(expr), name, parentenv, handler)
7. \-testthat::expect_equal(x, x$clone())
8. \-testthat:::expect_waldo_equal("equal", act, exp, info, ..., tolerance = tolerance)
9. \-testthat:::waldo_compare(...)
10. \-waldo::compare(x, y, ..., x_arg = x_arg, y_arg = y_arg)
11. \-waldo:::compare_structure(x, y, paths = c(x_arg, y_arg), opts = opts)
12. +-waldo::compare_proxy(x)
13. \-torch:::compare_proxy.torch_tensor(x)
We could simply skip this tests if on R <= 4.0 if you want.
The centOS error is indeed not related to this PR, don't worry about it.
Thx for fixing the typo! I think we are good to merge here?
Thank you @sebffischer !
I did not create a PR in waldo, because I think this method should be under full control of the torch package. I "hacked" it in, so waldo does not become a hard dependency here.