Open dfalbel opened 4 years ago
Looks like jpeg and png are faster than magick for reading images. We should probably use them instead:
jpeg
png
file <- "~/Downloads/tiny-imagenet/tiny-imagenet-200/train/n01443537/images/n01443537_0.JPEG" bench::mark( jpeg = jpeg::readJPEG(file), magick = as.integer(magick::image_data(magick::image_read(file), "rgb"))/255, check = FALSE ) #> # A tibble: 2 x 6 #> expression min median `itr/sec` mem_alloc `gc/sec` #> <bch:expr> <bch:tm> <bch:tm> <dbl> <bch:byt> <dbl> #> 1 jpeg 115µs 157.19µs 6189. 121.49KB 13.8 #> 2 magick 950µs 1.11ms 862. 5.45MB 2.04 file <- "~/Documents/torch/man/figures/torch.png" bench::mark( png = png::readPNG(file), magick = as.integer(magick::image_data(magick::image_read(file), "rgb"))/255, check = FALSE ) #> Warning: Some expressions had a GC in every iteration; so filtering is disabled. #> # A tibble: 2 x 6 #> expression min median `itr/sec` mem_alloc `gc/sec` #> <bch:expr> <bch:tm> <bch:tm> <dbl> <bch:byt> <dbl> #> 1 png 150ms 170ms 5.84 127MB 3.89 #> 2 magick 404ms 411ms 2.44 148MB 2.44
Created on 2020-08-29 by the reprex package (v0.3.0)
Looks like
jpeg
andpng
are faster than magick for reading images. We should probably use them instead:Created on 2020-08-29 by the reprex package (v0.3.0)