Closed paragonie-security closed 2 years ago
Odd, https://github.com/mmarkdown/mmark/blob/master/mmark.go#L76 should normalize those newlines
On Mon, 23 May 2022, 22:43 P.I.E. Security Team, @.***> wrote:
To help us debug your issue please add these details.
While trying to update the PASETO RFC draft, I kept getting this error:
$ make mmark paseto.md > draft-paragon-paseto-rfc-02.xml xml2rfc --v2 --html draft-paragon-paseto-rfc-02.xml Error: Unable to parse the XML document: draft-paragon-paseto-rfc-02.xml /home/robyn/projects/paseto-rfc/draft-paragon-paseto-rfc-02.xml: Line 45: Extra content at the end of the document
After a lot of wrong guesses, I found out the issue: I'm using a VirtualBox shared folder. My host OS is Windows, which checked out newlines as CRLF rather than just LF. This caused the title block to not be parsed, which caused invalid XML to be generated. This caused a downstream failure with xml2rfc. What went wrong? What version of mmark are you using?
Version 2,2,25. What is the most minimal markdown snippets that shows the problem?
Take a valid .md file from your test files, run unix2dos on that file, then pass it to the mmark program. Recommendation
One of the following:
- Support CRLF instead of just LF, or
- Clearly document this behavior so other people will know to normalize their line endings
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/mmarkdown/mmark/issues/176, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AACWIW2CORMCQJWVVVSJPYTVLPUXDANCNFSM5WXAO5CA . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>
% unix2dos 1035.md
unix2dos: converting file 1035.md to DOS format...
% make 1035.xml
../mmark 1035.md > 1035.xml
% make 1035.txt
xml2rfc --text --v3 1035.xml
/home/miek/src/github.com/mmarkdown/mmark/rfc/1035.xml(2397): Warning: Unused reference: There seems to be no reference to [IEN116] in the document
/home/miek/src/github.com/mmarkdown/mmark/rfc/1035.xml(2407): Warning: Unused reference: There seems to be no reference to [Quarterman86] in the document
/home/miek/src/github.com/mmarkdown/mmark/rfc/1035.xml(2396): Warning: Unused reference: There seems to be no reference to [RFC0742] in the document
/home/miek/src/github.com/mmarkdown/mmark/rfc/1035.xml(2396): Warning: Unused reference: There seems to be no reference to [RFC0799] in the document
/home/miek/src/github.com/mmarkdown/mmark/rfc/1035.xml(2396): Warning: Unused reference: There seems to be no reference to [RFC0805] in the document
/home/miek/src/github.com/mmarkdown/mmark/rfc/1035.xml(2396): Warning: Unused reference: There seems to be no reference to [RFC0810] in the document
/home/miek/src/github.com/mmarkdown/mmark/rfc/1035.xml(2396): Warning: Unused reference: There seems to be no reference to [RFC0811] in the document
/home/miek/src/github.com/mmarkdown/mmark/rfc/1035.xml(2396): Warning: Unused reference: There seems to be no reference to [RFC0812] in the document
/home/miek/src/github.com/mmarkdown/mmark/rfc/1035.xml(2396): Warning: Unused reference: There seems to be no reference to [RFC0819] in the document
/home/miek/src/github.com/mmarkdown/mmark/rfc/1035.xml(2396): Warning: Unused reference: There seems to be no reference to [RFC0821] in the document
/home/miek/src/github.com/mmarkdown/mmark/rfc/1035.xml(2396): Warning: Unused reference: There seems to be no reference to [RFC0830] in the document
/home/miek/src/github.com/mmarkdown/mmark/rfc/1035.xml(2396): Warning: Unused reference: There seems to be no reference to [RFC0883] in the document
/home/miek/src/github.com/mmarkdown/mmark/rfc/1035.xml(2396): Warning: Unused reference: There seems to be no reference to [RFC0920] in the document
/home/miek/src/github.com/mmarkdown/mmark/rfc/1035.xml(2396): Warning: Unused reference: There seems to be no reference to [RFC0952] in the document
/home/miek/src/github.com/mmarkdown/mmark/rfc/1035.xml(2396): Warning: Unused reference: There seems to be no reference to [RFC0953] in the document
/home/miek/src/github.com/mmarkdown/mmark/rfc/1035.xml(2396): Warning: Unused reference: There seems to be no reference to [RFC0973] in the document
/home/miek/src/github.com/mmarkdown/mmark/rfc/1035.xml(2396): Warning: Unused reference: There seems to be no reference to [RFC1001] in the document
/home/miek/src/github.com/mmarkdown/mmark/rfc/1035.xml(2396): Warning: Unused reference: There seems to be no reference to [RFC1002] in the document
/home/miek/src/github.com/mmarkdown/mmark/rfc/1035.xml(2396): Warning: Unused reference: There seems to be no reference to [RFC1031] in the document
/home/miek/src/github.com/mmarkdown/mmark/rfc/1035.xml(2396): Warning: Unused reference: There seems to be no reference to [RFC1032] in the document
/home/miek/src/github.com/mmarkdown/mmark/rfc/1035.xml(2396): Warning: Unused reference: There seems to be no reference to [RFC1033] in the document
/home/miek/src/github.com/mmarkdown/mmark/rfc/1035.xml(2441): Warning: Unused reference: There seems to be no reference to [Solomon82] in the document
Created file 1035.txt
rm -f 1035.xml
And
% head -20 1035.txt
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) P. Mockapetris
Request for Comments: 1035 ISI
Obsoletes: 882, 883, 973 24 May 2022
Category: Standards Track
ISSN: 2070-1721
Domain Names - Implementation and Specification
Abstract
This RFC describes the details of the domain system and protocol, and
assumes that the reader is familiar with the concepts discussed in a
companion RFC, "Domain Names - Concepts and Facilities" [RFC1034].
The domain system is a mixture of functions and data types which are
Interesting. I'm not sure what caused this specific failure, but we know on our end how to fix it.
Virtualbox shared folders and inconsistent behavior with Git + Jetbrains IDEs over the years might've created a weird state, which was fixed when I ran dos2unix
.
To help us debug your issue please add these details.
While trying to update the PASETO RFC draft, I kept getting this error:
After a lot of wrong guesses, I found out the issue: I'm using a VirtualBox shared folder. My host OS is Windows, which checked out newlines as CRLF rather than just LF. This caused the title block to not be parsed, which caused invalid XML to be generated. This caused a downstream failure with xml2rfc.
What went wrong?
What version of mmark are you using?
Version 2,2,25.
What is the most minimal markdown snippets that shows the problem?
Take a valid
.md
file from your test files, rununix2dos
on that file, then pass it to themmark
program.Recommendation
One of the following: