Closed fanf2 closed 6 years ago
ah. that looks like an easy fix
ah, you're holding it wrong, it should just be (#RFC2119)
. But this should lead to some improvements in docs; what do you want to do?
Well, it seems that what I actually wanted was [@!RFC2119]
which causes the right XML declarations to be included. I was led astray by converting a draft written using the Pandoc setup. But I think the [](#thing)
syntax ought to work the same with mmark as with pandoc, e.g. in case of explicit <reference>
sections.
I'm not in favor (yet) to add more syntax. Even with a <reference>
to cite it you need a variant [@....]
.
What went wrong?
With a long-form xref like the XML output is
and the HTML is
I expected no [] in the output.
What version of mmark are you using?
2.0.10
What command line did you use?
What platform (Linux/Apple/Windows)?