Closed nh13 closed 1 year ago
I'm leaving comments/decision/testing of this to @mmcguffi
My only comments are that I prefer the hyphen format for multiword options and that currently if I type plannotate batch
I get an error versus the help message that I expected for running with no options.
@jeffreybarrick what's the error you get? Did you remember to install the updated dependencies?
$ plannotate batch
Running command: plannotatebatch
usage: plannotate batch [-h] -i INPUT [-o OUTPUT] [-f FILE_NAME] [-s SUFFIX] [-y YAML_FILE] [-l | --linear | --no-linear] [--html | --no-html] [-c | --csv | --no-csv] [-d | --detailed | --no-detailed] [-g | --gbk | --no-gbk]
plannotate batch: error: the following arguments are required: -i/--input
$ plannotate batch -h
usage: plannotate batch [-h] -i INPUT [-o OUTPUT] [-f FILE_NAME] [-s SUFFIX] [-y YAML_FILE] [-l | --linear | --no-linear] [--html | --no-html] [-c | --csv | --no-csv] [-d | --detailed | --no-detailed] [-g | --gbk | --no-gbk]
Annotates engineered DNA sequences, primarily plasmids. Accepts a FASTA or GenBank file and outputs
a GenBank file with annotations, as well as an optional interactive plasmid map as an HTLM file.
optional arguments:
-h, --help show this help message and exit
-i INPUT, --input INPUT
path to the input FASTA or GBK file
-o OUTPUT, --output OUTPUT
path to the output folder
(default: .)
-f FILE_NAME, --file-name FILE_NAME
name of output file (do not add extension). If not provided, uses the input file name.
(default: None)
-s SUFFIX, --suffix SUFFIX
suffix appended to output files. Use '' for no suffix.
(default: _pLann)
-y YAML_FILE, --yaml-file YAML_FILE
(default: /Users/nhomer/work/git/pLannotate/plannotate/data/data/databases.yml)
-l, --linear, --no-linear
enables linear DNA annotation
(default: True)
--html, --no-html creates an html plasmid map in specified path
(default: True)
-c, --csv, --no-csv creates a cvs file in specified path
(default: True)
-d, --detailed, --no-detailed
uses modified algorithm for a more-detailed search with more false positives
(default: True)
My comment was about the current code not the updated PR code... glad to see it does print the help with the updated code.
defopt
seems interesting and I like how elegant it appears to be. I'll dig into it a little more and decide then -- thanks for writing up the PR at a minimum.
Just an FYI I'm currently in the process of moving across the country and starting a new job, so I won't be able to test/address these immediately, but I definitely will once I am settled.
No urgency here. This is all just trying to give back as I find things.
I very much appreciate the effort on this @nh13, but I am going to stick with click
for now -- maybe this is a foolish, sisyphean choice since click
has burned me so many times, but I guess we'll see...
At some point I intend to refactor and add type hints/docstrings throughout, so maybe I'll re-assess defopt
then
Thanks again for the help and labor!
Note: defopt is very opinionated on the single and long flag namings, so there is some backwards incompatibility (e.g.
--file-name
versus--file_name
).