Please review the attached patch. It fixes a wrong comparison of a pointer
address being <= 0. This is replaced by comparing the pointer address being
equal to NULL (== 0).
Best regards and many thanks
Martin Ettl
Original issue reported on code.google.com by ettl.mar...@gmail.com on 26 Jan 2014 at 7:12
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
ettl.mar...@gmail.com
on 26 Jan 2014 at 7:12Attachments: