Closed guanhuaw closed 2 years ago
Hello @guanhuaw, thanks for bringing this up. Are the values consistent without the use of norm="ortho"
?
Thanks! When the norm = None, the values are consistent under my test cases.
Working on this (slowly, after work on my own time). I created a test suite in this new branch and was able to reproduce the issue.
@guanhuaw PR #39 should fix this. Would you be willing to review it and try it on your use case?
I'm going to go ahead and merge. If you encounter issues with the new version please let me know.
Hi @mmuckley thanks for the update!
When testing with the latest commit, it seems that norm = None
or norm = 'ortho'
will produce the same results for the ToepNufft module, deviant from v1.2. My guess is that the updated calc_toeplitz_kernel
function causes this problem.
Hello @guanhuaw could you clarify the problem? I don't understand your message.
Thanks! The results are exactly the same for norm = None
or norm = 'ortho
' scenarios, and there is no scaling factor between the two.
Hi Matthew, Thanks for such an elegant implementation for NUFFT on Pytorch. I have on little question: when choosing 'ortho' norm and the grid_size is not exactly 2*im_size, the scale of ToepNUFFT is inconsistent with AdjKbNufft(KbNufft()). This also happens before 1.0.0. Thanks in advance.