Closed larsoner closed 10 months ago
Absolutely, we shouldn't expect task-noise
when writing empty-room fine-calibration and cross-talk
agreed, these files shouldn't even have a task
entity: https://bids-specification.readthedocs.io/en/latest/appendices/meg-file-formats.html#cross-talk-and-fine-calibration-files
I tried writing a fine cal file for empty-room data and got:
This is because in
write_meg_calibration
it does:So it copies the subject (
"emptyroom"
) but not the task("noise")
.It seems like either the logic should be reworked here a bit, or an informative error should be raised if you try to write fine cal for empy room data.