Closed CarinaFo closed 2 years ago
Hello! š Thanks for opening your first issue here! ā¤ļø We will try to get back to you soon. š“š½āāļø
I've reproduced this locally on current main
it seems that the visual_92 data files have a FIFF_REF_FILE_NUM
tag but don't actually have subsequent files (?). This dataset is only actually used in 2 places in our docs, and both are _sgskip
files so they never actually get executed/tested. Here are the lines where the tag gets matched and triggers next_fname
to not be None
:
I'm not sure how to dig deeper; I don't know much about the origin of that dataset (or how things like split files are encoded in the FIFF standard)
I can replicate the pb. Only one file was shared with me years ago. Just do:
raws = [read_raw_fif(fname % block, verbose='error', on_split_missing='ignore')
for block in range(n_runs)] # ignore filename warnings
in the script. Any volunteer to send the PR?
this wasn't actually fixed yet, as the linked PR wasn't merged. reopening.
while executing line 83 - 84: raws = [read_raw_fif(fname, verbose='error') for fname in fnames] this error pops up: