say the cloud is the same between intuitive and perturbation. is this a requirement for any sampling-based hypothesis?
maybe, by showing results on splitIntuitive ("Exp. 1"), this assumption is no longer relevant, since you'd assume the cloud is the same between the first and second half of intuitive session. and then the fact that the error is only slightly higher (though see #223) is evidence that maybe the cloud is still the same in perturbation?
say the cloud is the same between intuitive and perturbation. is this a requirement for any sampling-based hypothesis?
maybe, by showing results on splitIntuitive ("Exp. 1"), this assumption is no longer relevant, since you'd assume the cloud is the same between the first and second half of intuitive session. and then the fact that the error is only slightly higher (though see #223) is evidence that maybe the cloud is still the same in perturbation?