Closed tischi closed 4 years ago
Yes, that would be amazing! We could also use this for other structures; e.g. cilia which I am segmenting right now.
I am working on making the whole 3D View aspect more professional and:
2 2 2 3 4 5 3 2 4 9 10 12
with x0 y0 z0 x1 y1 z1 x2 y2 z2 ...
. Probably there are more clever ways, e.g. storing only differences to a starting point (https://stackoverflow.com/questions/283299/best-compression-algorithm-for-a-sequence-of-integers) What do you think?
1. I feel it would be good to precompute the meshes (i.e. a list of some coordinates on the surface).
Yes, that sounds like a good idea if you want to improve performance.
2\. Probably there are more clever ways, e.g. storing only differences to a starting point
For performance / efficient storage it might also help to serialize a (compressed) byte stream instead of the table version.
progress:
Testimonials :-) F**uck!!!!! XD OMFG! Amazing!!! WOWWW
@constantinpape
I just got very excited because I found that the 3DViewer API allows having multiple objects with different transparency. So, if both nucleus and cell label masks are active we can probably, upon
ctrl+shift+click
show both the cell and the nucleus in one 3D viewer window, and even make the cell a bit more transparent such that one can see the nucleus inside. Isn't that amaaaaazing? :-)Just a demo (not real data):