Closed tony closed 1 year ago
I should also rewind: I am in a chipper disposition and am happy with the project. Just have a universal distaste for GH Releases.
I've nothing wrong with GH Releases to supplement things, but I'd never suggest it as a replacement for an actual changelog
Example from a project of mine: CHANGES file, CHANGES on docs site, Release
Hey @tony! Sorry no one got back to you for so long.
I'm going to convert this to a discussion topic, rather than an issue. I don't want to close it out entirely, but I am just sort of getting up to speed on the core team here and I don't have a yes/no for you.
Thanks for the idea, and apologies once more for the delay!
Hi, thank you for the project!
Feature request Changelog file
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. <4.0's changelog was better IMO.
Describe the solution you'd like
Describe alternatives you've considered There's no alternative but it seems changelog.md was removed in favor of releases in >4.0 in favor of GitHub Releases.
Additional context
Are you willing to (attempt) a PR?
[x] Yes
But a maintainer would be a better for this. Also it would be appropriate to curate releases,