Closed subzero911 closed 2 years ago
Name | Link |
---|---|
Latest commit | 65a784124f31f6379775a93b70f42dd59315ff40 |
Latest deploy log | https://app.netlify.com/sites/mobx/deploys/62b37183d46deb0008044a02 |
Merging #831 (65a7841) into master (4f98362) will decrease coverage by
0.15%
. The diff coverage is0.00%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #831 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 98.80% 98.65% -0.16%
==========================================
Files 56 56
Lines 1931 1931
==========================================
- Hits 1908 1905 -3
- Misses 23 26 +3
Flag | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
flutter_mobx | 96.90% <ø> (-3.10%) |
:arrow_down: |
mobx | 98.32% <0.00%> (ø) |
|
mobx_codegen | 100.00% <ø> (ø) |
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
...src/api/extensions/primitive_types_extensions.dart | 0.00% <0.00%> (ø) |
|
mobx/lib/src/core.dart | 100.00% <ø> (ø) |
|
flutter_mobx/lib/src/observer_widget_mixin.dart | 92.30% <0.00%> (-7.70%) |
:arrow_down: |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 4f98362...65a7841. Read the comment docs.
@pavanpodila can you approve the MR?
@pavanpodila can you approve the MR?
there seems to be a big drop in coverage. Can you please look into that @subzero911 ?
codecov/patch
https://github.com/mobxjs/mobx.dart/pull/831/checks?check_run_id=6981802810
The check fails on lines 5, 12, 26, 33
These are function signatures - how am I supposed to test them? It seems to be impossible
Tests for function bodies are written.
Anyway, I added some tests for typedefs (to ensure they are corresponding to their generic types).
codecov/project/flutter_mobx — 96.90% (-3.10%) compared to 4f98362
I hadn't touch the flutter_mobx
project - how could it drop the coverage?
@pavanpodila it swears at observer_widget_mixin.dart
- but it was changed in 2.0.6+1 version, not by me.
*
Fixes 2.0.7
I want to push a little fix for my 2.0.7 update. It was very recent, and this fix won't touch many users. I found in practice that
1.asObservable()
is ugly and has no big difference toObservableInt(1)
So I changed it to.obs()
It is short and convenient for GetX users (which use.obs
getter) to jump to MobX.