Closed thaJeztah closed 4 years ago
Thats not the same fix, netlink was not setting the socket to -1 so it might become reused as another socket. This is just telling you it got closed, which should not work better. So I would leave this.
🤔 hm, I probably misinterpreted 😓 closing
This check is already handled by NetLinkSocket.Receive() since vishvananda/netlink#125, so we can remove the check here.
noticed this while updating netlink in libnetwork