MSL 4.1.0 Regressions - Mechanics.Rotational and Mechanics.Translational

[GallLeo]

The following models fail in result comparison. Tested revision: f9bddf86 (2024-02-16)

Changed models, need reference update after library officer check:

• [x] Modelica.Mechanics.Rotational.Examples.EddyCurrentBrake

  • Reason: The component has been enhanced in a backwards compatible way with an optional excitation input, which is demonstrated by this upgraded example. @GallLeo pls. create new reference results.
  • Updated reference files?

• [x] Modelica.Mechanics.Translational.Examples.EddyCurrentBrake

  • Reason: The component has been enhanced in a backwards compatible way with an optional excitation input, which is demonstrated by this upgraded example. @GallLeo pls. create new reference results.
  • Updated reference files?

• [ ] Release notes check: All classes mentioned which could lead to result changes in user models? @GallLeo could you please feed the explanation to the release notes? Thx a lot!

---

Useful Links

_Current comparison report: https://www.ltx.de/download/MA/Compare_MSL_v4.1.0/comparison_report_overview.html -> Reference result test -> Comparison_

Comparison signal definitions: https://github.com/modelica/ModelicaStandardLibrary/tree/master/Modelica/Resources/Reference/Modelica https://github.com/modelica/ModelicaStandardLibrary/tree/master/ModelicaTest/Resources/Reference/ModelicaTest

_Reference results: https://github.com/modelica/MAP-LIB_ReferenceResults_

[tobolar]

All three points fine to me. @AHaumer after checking the points, you can please tick them all.

[AHaumer]

@tobolar I won't tick the points, @GallLeo will do that as soon as he has created new reference results.

[GallLeo]

@Esther-Devakirubai Can you please, whether the release notes mention EddyCurrentBrake?