Closed olpie101 closed 9 months ago
It will remove the lookup value only for the specific aggregate of this event. This depends on the aggregate data of the event:
type SomeEvent struct {}
func (data SomeEvent) ProvideLookup(p lookup.Provider) {
p.Remove(SomeEventLookup)
}
func example(id uuid.UUID) {
// The lookup is for the specific aggregate with name "foo" and the provided id.
evt := event.New("foobar", SomeEvent{}, event.Aggregate(id, "foo", 1))
// The lookup is for the aggregate with name "" and uuid.Nil (global/singleton lookup)
evt := event.New("foobar", SomeEvent{})
// The lookup is for the aggregate with name "foo" and uuid.Nil (lookup is for _all_ "foo" aggregates)
evt := event.New("foobar", SomeEvent{}, event.Aggregate(uuid.Nil, "foo", 1))
// The lookup is for the aggregate with name "" and the provided id (lookup is for _all_ aggregates with the provided id)
evt := event.New("foobar", SomeEvent{}, event.Aggregate(id, "", 1))
}
Thank you. This makes sense. Is there a way to test this? I noticed that if I attempt to use a WaitGroup
, like in the example below, it becomes flaky.
const LookUpKey = "lookup"
type SomeProvideEvent struct {
Key string
}
func (data SomeProvideEvent) ProvideLookup(p lookup.Provider) {
p.Provide(LookUpKey, data.Key)
}
type SomeRemoveEvent struct {}
func (data SomeRemoveEvent) ProvideLookup(p lookup.Provider) {
p.Remove(LookUpKey)
}
func example() {
evts := []event.Event{
event.New("foobarprovide", SomeProvideEvent{}, event.Aggregate("foo", id)),
event.New("foobarremove", SomeRemoveEvent{}, event.Aggregate("foo", id)),
}
b := eventbus.New()
s := eventstore.New()
lk := lookup.New(s, b, []string{"foobarprovide", "foobarremove"})
_, _ = lk.Run(context.Background())
b.Publish(context.Background(), evts...)
var wg sync.WaitGroup
wg.Add(1)
go func() {
defer wg.Done()
<-time.After(5 * time.Second)
}()
wg.Wait()
_, ok := lk.Lookup(context.Background(), "someaggregate", LookUpKey, id)
fmt.Println("found?", ok) // <- this is non-deterministic. Sometimes it's true. Other times its false
}
This issue was actually caused by the event bus implementation. Your code should work now with v0.4.5.
Makes sense. Thank you for the clarification.
Does the remove method remove a single value or all values? If we use the following example for an event:
Does this remove the value for this event from the lookup or all values for the given lookup key. If it remove all values, is there a way to remove a single key from the lookup?