Open Julien-K opened 1 year ago
@Julien-K apology for the delay here. Someone else more knowledgeable might jump in here and correct me but I don't think there is a clean way to do this — consistent naming for input and output files (per the given model name) seems like the ideal behavior, so this could even be considered a bug?
This example could be helpful: https://flopy.readthedocs.io/en/3.3.5/_notebooks/tutorial02_mf6_data.html
And mf6obs
API: https://flopy.readthedocs.io/en/3.3.5/source/flopy.mf6.modflow.mfutlobs.html
It is possible that multiple obs
output files can be used in the same package. Therefore, it is not applicable to use a uniform case name for all the files.
@Julien-K, for better or worse, we've set up flopy and MODFLOW 6 to use a dedicated folder for each simulation. Since you are changing the folder name for each case is it necessary to change the base file name inside the folder as well? Just trying to fully understand the use case.
Hi Christian, that's indeed what I was trying to do: each simulation's name is the folder's name. It works for all files but the output files (lst, bhd and csv files).
Dear maintainers,
I'm not sure the following described behaviour is a feature request or a bug, or something I missed in the doc.
I'm working on parametric grids; I have a ModelMuse-generated mf6 project as base model and I want to duplicate it for each case of my study.
Each case-model should be named with a pattern:
myModel
myModel_v01
....myModel_v11
Here is a code sample:
All input files are correctly named following the given pattern.
But output file names for packages OC, OBS and IMS (at least) are not modified following the given pattern, I still get:
I see from the doc that I can alter manually the 'bhd' file (OC package) and the IMS output files, but I didn't find a method for the OBS6 output files.
Is there a clean way to rename all these files?
Regards, Julien