search

modflowpy / flopy

A Python package to create, run, and post-process MODFLOW-based models.
https://flopy.readthedocs.io
Other
517 stars 313 forks source link

MF96 capability #49

Closed ghost closed 9 years ago

ghost commented 9 years ago

Hi, is there a way to make FloPy load an old MF96 model? Apologies if this is the wrong place to post a question like this. Leads to my second question. Is this the place to post user questions or should they also be posted on the MODFLOW users group?

langevin-usgs commented 9 years ago

Hello Tariq, flopy will not load a MODFLOW-96 model, and I'm not sure that we will support that anytime soon. There is, however, a program that comes with MODFLOW-2000 (http://water.usgs.gov/nrp/gwsoftware/modflow2000/modflow2000.html) that will convert a 96 model into a 2000 model. Perhaps you should give that a shot.

Questions like this are fine to post here, as well as requests for bug fixes or other new capabilities. If you have general questions about how to use Python or flopy, then we'd prefer that you try a users group. Good luck!

ghost commented 9 years ago

Thanks Chris,

I have since downloaded the tool and recompiled it to work with larger models. FloPy rocks!

Tariq

From: langevin-usgs [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: Thursday, 3 September 2015 8:51 PM To: modflowpy/flopy Cc: Tariq Laattoe Subject: Re: [flopy] MF96 capability (#49)

Hello Tariq, flopy will not load a MODFLOW-96 model, and I'm not sure that we will support that anytime soon. There is, however, a program that comes with MODFLOW-2000 (http://water.usgs.gov/nrp/gwsoftware/modflow2000/modflow2000.html) that will convert a 96 model into a 2000 model. Perhaps you should give that a shot.

Questions like this are fine to post here, as well as requests for bug fixes or other new capabilities. If you have general questions about how to use Python or flopy, then we'd prefer that you try a users group. Good luck!

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/modflowpy/flopy/issues/49#issuecomment-137411308.