Closed ghost closed 2 years ago
IMHO, m3swig is more useful.
IMHO, m3swig is more useful.
It's useful for C++. This is plain C. Isn't that mean the C interface of yours is too complex for humans to write so need to depend on a machine generator?
08.09.2022, 20:21, "zpu2tw" @.***>:
IMHO, m3swig is more useful.
It's useful for C++. This is plain C. Isn't that mean the C interface of yours is too complex for humans to write so need to depend on a machine generator?
In any key try m3swig -) If You want, of course -)
I want to use this C library: https://github.com/dbsoft/dwindows
As it's not very complex I prefer to write by hand (not using swig, but if it's needed I have no problems with it too).