Closed russella closed 11 years ago
Hi,
fixed by the following redefinition:
\renewbibmacro*{series+number}{%
\printfield{number}%
\setunit*{\addspace}%
\iffieldundef{series}{}%
{
\usebibmacro{in:}%
\printfield{series}%
}%
\newunit}
regards Marco
Dear Marco,
It seems that there is a bug in the treatment of incollection & inproceedings (I recall that you hadn't completely implemented inproceedings yet). For, e.g., the following entry
Using the trad-plain style, this is laid out with an extra "in":
Regards, Alex